Showing posts with label China. Show all posts
Showing posts with label China. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 03, 2012

List of Global Brands Keeps Coke on Top, and Apple Jumps Up

 

From the New York Times:

List of Global Brands Keeps Coke on Top, and Apple Jumps Up

Just a quick thought or so --

The sidebar to the left shows the 2012, 2011 and 2010.  Note that Apple jumped way up and Nokia fell like the proverbial rock.

If you go to the actual survey (link in the NYT article and here), you'll notice the presence of a number of luxury brands:

17.  Louis Vuitton
38.  Gucci
63.  Hermés
68.  Cartier (here's the Cartier commercial from the evening class)
70. Tiffany & Co.
84.  Prada

Remember where the growth for these brands is?  If you said China, you'd be right. 

Gucci on growth in China (video)

China’s rich feeds luxury brands and tourism in Europe

The Top 50 Most-Searched for Luxury Brands in China.

That is all.

Monday, September 24, 2012

"Stuff"

The next installments on the CIVETS should be up tomorrow, but in the meantime, look at this Chinese photographer's project to take pictures of people and all of their possessions.  The New York Times article's comments pointed out that photographer Peter Menzel did the same thing twenty years ago.....

See some of his pictures from Material World here..  A follow-up book, Hungry Planet, looked at what people eatWomen in the Material World moved beyond possessions and food to look at women's experiences overall (this is, I believe, a chapter from that book).

Friday, September 14, 2012

"More saving. More doing." But, "nothing doing" in China.

From today's Financial Times -- Home Depot Shuts Big Box Stores in China.

According to the article, Chinese customers are less likely to be interested in do-it-yourself (DIY) home improvements (since many workers are migrant workers).  But, reasons don't matter.  Chinese consumers aren't just that into DIY.

According to Home Depot:
"Closing stores is always a difficult decision," said chairman & CEO, The Home Depot. "We are thankful for the dedicated service of our store associates in China, and we wish them all the best during this transition."

While it is closing its big box stores, The Home Depot is maintaining a new formats team to continue research and development activities. In addition, the Company is maintaining two recently-opened specialty stores - a paint and flooring store and a Home Decorators Collection store, both located in - and is in the beginning stages of developing relationships with several of China's leading e-commerce websites, a combination which the Company believes is more tailored to Chinese customers' needs and shopping preferences.

"We've learned a great deal over the last six years in China, and our new approach leverages that experience and reflects our continuing interest in providing value to Chinese customers, as well as our shareholders," said Blake.
 
My favorite part is the last paragraph. "Our new approach leverages that experience..."  Where I come from, they call that "learning from your mistakes."  But, I do loathe and despise business buzzwords.

That is all for today.

Tuesday, April 03, 2012

Some interesting reading

I ran across this today, from the (UK) Financial Times.  It's a blog dedicated to what we call "emerging markets" or "poorer countries."

Remeber that shorthand here -- BRIC, or Brazil, Russia, India and China, or the economies of the 21st century.

A few interesting posts:

Sina and Tencent: dark clouds and silver linings (microblogging in China).  Also, the Economist article on why Chinese and Japanese are such good languages for microblogging.

Filling a Gap in South Africa (clothing retailing)

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Aging Japan

According to an article in yesterday's Washington Post, Japan is undergoing a demographic crisis:







Japan’s population of 128 million will shrink by one-third and seniors will account for 40 percent of people by 2060, placing a greater burden on a smaller working-age population to support the social security and tax systems.




The article goes on to say that, by 2060, the retired (that is, not working) proportion of the population will reach 40%. The Japanese government is proposing tax increases to fund these looming pension liabilities, but faces parlimentary opposition in doing so. And, the standard retirement age is 60.



It isn't just an issue of money, though. The number of nursing homes and the avialability of caretakers are an issue as well. It's to the point where the Japanese are developing robots that can move patients, help the elderly dress, and, most frighteningly of all, provide companionship:







Scientists have invented therapeutic robotic babies that are intended to make life easier for nursing home residents. These Babyloids are being tested in facilities across Japan. During the tests, residents interact with the robots in eight-minute intervals for a total of 90 minutes each day. Designed to resemble infants, these robots simulate human emotions such as crying. This in turn tends to trigger a response among actual people. So far, the Babyloids are showing early promise at reducing depression and despair among residents.




And, this is in a retiree population that, having lost the personal ties from work, is already lonely.




There is, though an argument that the falling birthrate in Japan is an unintended consequence of a deliberate and rational decision on the part of the Japanese. To quote at length from the New York Times:







Take, for instance, how Western observers have viewed Japan’s demographics. The population is getting older because of a low birthrate, a characteristic Japan shares with many of the world’s richest nations. Yet this is presented not only as a critical problem but as a policy failure. It never seems to occur to Western commentators that the Japanese both individually and collectively have chosen their demographic fate — and have good reasons for doing so.




The story begins in the terrible winter of 1945-6, when, newly bereft of their empire, the Japanese nearly starved to death. With overseas expansion no longer an option, Japanese leaders determined as a top priority to cut the birthrate. Thereafter a culture of small families set in that has continued to the present day.




Japan’s motivation is clear: food security. With only about one-third as much arable land per capita as China, Japan has long been the world’s largest net food importer. While the birth control policy is the primary cause of Japan’s aging demographics, the phenomenon also reflects improved health care and an increase of more than 20 years in life expectancy since 1950.




The demographic trends in the EU and the US are not dissimilar. However, the participation of women in the paid labor force in the EU has room to increase, and in both the US and the EU, immigration (documented or otherwise) is another safety valve.




Despite the problems of issues in Japan, I'd rather be old in Japan than in China, where for all but the very rich, "nursing home" translates as "snake pit" or "hellhole."

Thursday, October 07, 2010

Renault sells $4.2B stake in truck maker Volvo - Yahoo! News

Renault sells $4.2B stake in truck maker Volvo - Yahoo! News

Ok. This is where we need a handy laminated chart to figure out what's going on.

First, what Renault owned was not the automotive part of Volvo. The Chinese own that now; Ford did own it and recently sold it to the Chinese automaker Geely.

What Renault sold what their ownership in the still-Swedish-owned Volvo Truck.

Straighforward enough, you might say. Not really, because that's just the beginning of Renault's complex ownership structure.

Renault also owns 44% of Nissan. At the same time, Nissan owns 15% of Renault.

Let's bring in the Germans. I quote here directly from Renault:



"On April 17, 2010 the Renault-Nissan Alliance and Daimler AG announced a broad strategic cooperation that will enable both groups to already realize benefits quickly from a range of concrete projects as well as sharing of best practices. The two groups also announced an equity exchange that will give the Renault-Nissan Alliance a 3.1% stake in Daimler and Daimler a 3.1% in Renault and a 3.1% stake in Nissan."



Next. I'd never heard of AvtoVAZ before, but seems that they are the top Russian auto manufacturer. Renault owns 20% of AvtoVAZ.


Last but not least -- Fiat owns 35% of Chrysler.


I did find this, a chart of auto company/brand ownership, but it's from 2008, so the interest is primarily historical. It does give a nice feel for the complexity of it, though; the only problem is that it doesn't seem to pick up the 378 different auto companies in developing countries that are owned in part by one or the other of the EU-US-China-Japan-Korea cartel.


Checking with our in-house auto industry expert, Dr. Jeff Schultz -- his take is that the player to watch is Renault/Nissan, followed by Ford. He sees these two compnaies as having the best management of any of the major auto firms.









Monday, August 09, 2010

Iran and China: New Developments

For the past several years, China has worked to build trade relationships with African and Latin American countries -- Argentina, for example, as well as Sudan, Nigeria and Peru.

It's motivated (as we've discussed in the IB class) by China's growing need for raw materials -- such as recycled paper (for the cardboard boxes that Made-in-China TV is shipped in), soybeans, iron ore and gold. China has an advantage over Europe and the US here -- China isn't a former colonial power (not that the US really was a colonial power or anything, but who cares?). It's been a successful relationship. Even though Japan, South Korea and Taiwan are the biggest source of Chinese imports, China is now Brazil's largest export partner (ahead of the US); Angola, Chile, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Kazakhstan are among the countries sharing that honor.

One of the Chinese trade relationships that is currently troubling to the US is the Chinese relationship with Iran, based, of course, on oil. It goes beyond imports and exports; China has invested heavily in refineries and pipelines in Iran. Moreover, the Iranian government has proposed a system of rail links between China, Iran, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan.

Trade sanctions (banning trade in strategic materials) against Iran have slowed, but not stopped trade between China and Iran.

What exactly can the US do here? Not much. The UN can make agreements, but China is going to act in their own interests. Neither the US nor the EU wants to see Iran with nuclear weapons, but it doesn't appear that the Chinese care.

Don't forget that the Chinese own a lot of US government debt [1]. And, the US exports a lot to China as well -- luxury products [2] such as wine and ginseng roots, but also basic raw materials, such as recycled paper and soybeans.

The batteries in my crystal ball need to be recharged, but I don't see much changing here. It's a tenuous balancing act between the EU [3] and the US, first, China second, and Iran, third. One solution might be for the US to take out Iranian nuclear facilities, making sure to give China plausible deniability. That could get very very messy, though. There's some indication that the Iranian government isn't all that stable, and changes there could very well make a peaceful solution possible. The US would probably have to concede in principle on Iran's right to peaceful nuclear use, though, which would be politically suicidal for the current administration.

Taking a broader and more long-term perspective, though, look at China's trade strategy overall.

China's motivations here are complex. At first glance, the whole point is access to resources. For example, the Democratic Republic of the Congo has copper, Iran has oil, Brazil has wood pulp, etc. China is also investing heavily in infrastructure development in its African and Latin American trading partners. They're thinking long-term. Remember, the Chinese are the folks who have kept track of the (more than 3 million) descendants of Confucius over a 2,500 year span.

Not everyone sees China's growing ties with Africa/Latin America to be a Big Problem; some believe that US influence in Africa is broader based and more likely to be lasting.

But, as we remeber from The Godfather, "it's only business." Trade appears to be the real motivation, with politics being only a means to an end.

It's clear that China isn't in this for their health; China cut off imports of Argentine soybean oil after Argentina imposed retaliatory tariffs in response to accusations that China is dumping textiles and kitchen appliances in the Argentine market.

Another indication that the Chinese government isn't seeing these relationships as one-sided are developments earlier with loans to Zimbabwe:

Deputy Prime Minister Arthur Mutambara says the Chinese want all loans to
be repaid before loosening its purse. According to the Mutambara the Chinese
President Hu Jintao revealed to him during a brief meeting at the World Economic
Forum in Switzerland that he considers Beijing relationship with Harare as
’business partners’ and not ’friends’.


If nothing else, the complexities of trade and politics between China and the rest of the world will give us something to think about for a very long time to come.

Notes

[1] There is some indication that Chinese purchases of US debt declined after the late 2008 economic meltdown. They still hold a lot, though by now China holds enough Treasury securities that it's probably unlikely that they could afford to unload them.

[2] Western luxury products are big in China, though most of these are imported from Europe.

[3] Europe trades a lot with China, too.

Tuesday, March 03, 2009

Why Skilled Immigrants Are Leaving the U.S.

Immigration, legal or illegal, has been a political hot button in recent years. Now, it seems, many immigrants are returning home -- unfortunately, these folks are the people that the US needs to keep.

There's no question but that innovation is the key to creating and sustaining competitive advantage, whether its on the level of the individual, the organization and the country (and if this doesn't compute, flip back in your notes to Michael Porter). What appears, though, to be happening, as described in this article, is that highly skilled individuals, often from India and China, are returning home and taking their skills with them. The article puts it quite simply:

The U.S. is no longer the only land of opportunity. If we don't want the immigrants who have fueled our innovation and economic growth, they now have options elsewhere.

So, where does this leave the US economy. Well, again, I think it's pretty simple. People such as:
  • Vinod Khosla (one of the founders of Sun Microsystems)
  • Arun Netravali (Bell Labs and Lucent)
  • C.K Prahalad (Distingiushed Professor of Management at the University of Michigan)
  • Roger Y. Tsien (2008 Nobel Prize winner in Chemistry and professor at the University of California - San Diego)

aren't the people that we need to pack up and leave the US.




Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Valentine's Day in China

This is the article I mentioned last night in the IB class.

China's rich spend big to celebrate Valentine's Day - Yahoo! News

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

China's Hu promises win-win partnership in South Africa - Yahoo! News

It appears that China has developed a deep interest in Africa. According to a news story today,


"Both sides vowed to deepen the political partnership and business cooperation for mutual benefit and win-win outcomes," said [Chinese President] Hu at a joint press conference on the sixth leg of an eight-nation tour of Africa."

Why is China interested in strengthening ties with Africa? According to some, it isn't altruism:
China is keen to tap into Africa's abundant natural resources to feed its economic growth but it has faced accusations of being too willing to turn a blind eye to the excesses of regimes, such as Sudan, as well as using Africa as a dumping ground for cheap goods, particularly textiles.

And, as pointed out in an October 2006 article in the Economist, trade with China only benefits Africa's elite, who are the ones who have control over minerals and petroleum.

Is it possible that the Chinese are sincere in their interest in Africa?
[South African President] Mbeki has previously stated that China will not "replicate the historic colonial economic relationship in terms of which Africa served as a source of raw materials and a market for goods manufactured in the countries of the colonisers."

However, that's what appears to have happened. China exports far more to Africa than it imports. On the other hand, China has forgiven debt and spent money on building roads and other infrastructure in several (oil -producing) Afriacan countries.

One throwaway comment in another Economist article caught my attention, though. China is beginning to import cotton from Africa. The only reason the US trade deficit with China isn't larger than it is -- US exports of cotton to China.

Your thoughts?

China's Hu promises win-win partnership in South Africa - Yahoo! News

Monday, May 22, 2006

Wall-Mart pulls out of Korea - Yahoo! News

Wal-Mart pulls out of Korea - Yahoo! News

What's interesting here -- toward the end of the article, it mentions that Carrefour is also bailing out of South Korea. The British (Tesco) are doing ok, but they're in a joint venture with a South Korean firm, Samsung (whose Shinsegae subsidiary bought the Wal-Mart operation).

The next step, China. The Wal-Mart folks say that the proceeds from the sale of the Korean units will go towards increasing their presence in China. Only problem is that the Koreans are saying the same thing:


"As a result, E-Mart will increase the number of outlets to 102 including seven in China and will take on all 3,356 workers hired by Wal-Mart."

"With the acquisition of Wal-Mart stores, we will secure the ground for our stable business at home. This will also help us step up our operations in China," Shinsegae president Koo Hak-Seo told reporters."


Stay tuned here for updates.....as far as success in China goes, I'd put my money on the South Korean firms.

Saturday, February 11, 2006

Geographic Name Changes

One minor source of confusion can be when a country, region, or city changes its name or goes by more then one name.

From "Turin" to "Torino": Olympics Put New Name on the Map

As in this case, lots of differences stem from translation to English.

In other instances, it's political. For example, St. Petersburg (Russia) went to Petrograd (anti-German feeling in WWI), then to Leningrad (after the Russian Revolution), and now back to St. Petersburg.

For these -- 1 homework point for each that you can explain ("This is the old name, this is the new name"). Find one or two more that I didn't, for 1 or 2 more points.

Other examples of "old" and "new" names -- Volgograd, Persia, Myanmar, Zaire, Beijing, East Pakistan.

Defunct names -- countries that no longer exist -- Yugoslavia,
Czechoslovakia

For other examples, look at internet suffixes -- .ch, .de, .za, .es, .kh. And the really really strange internet domain -- .cat (which is not yet actually in use).

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

Internet Censorship

Real quick -- here it is. Note that this also happens in Europe.

Google: China decision painful but right - Yahoo! News

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

More bad news for brand counterfeiters in China

I'd always said that the problem of brnad counterfeiting in China wasn't going to go away. Bring out the knife and fork, because I need to dine on those words.

Designer brand pirates told to pack their bags

Monday, January 02, 2006

Starbucks wins China trademark fight

An ongoing discussion in the International Business class has been the problem with China and intellectual property -- specifically, the reluctance of the Chinese government to take meaningful action to crack down on rampant brand counterfeiting, copyright infringment, and the like. Maybe this is a start???

Starbucks wins China trademark fight - Business - International Herald Tribune

Thursday, November 10, 2005

Hong Kong Disney Opening -- Not 100% Smooth

Although, as the Disney spokesperson points out, any opening will have problems.

USATODAY.com - Miscues mar opening of Hong Kong Disney

September Trade Deficit Numbers -- Not Good

U.S. September Trade Deficit Widens to Record $66.1 Billion

The various analysts and company spokespersons quoted in this article don't seem to be especially worried; they attribute the "record" deficits to one-time events, such as the Boeing strike and the September hurricanes. Ok, the Boeing strike is settled, and planes are shipping again, but the impact of the hurricanes isn't going to just vanish overnight.

ALso, the administration is trying to put pressure on China to (1) limit clothing exports to the US and (2) allow the yuan to float (a floating yuan will make Chinese exports more expensive in the US, and should reduce our trade deficit with China). Maybe I'm a professional pessimist, but this doesn't exactly cheer me up.

Incidentally, what's driving that $20 billion + traded eficit with China??? According to the US Census Buraeu (who tracks this information), we're buying "primarily toys, games, and sporting goods; TV’s and VCR’s; stereo equipment; and computers."

Your thoughts ?

Friday, September 16, 2005

International Business Exam

Which Scandinavian country doesn't fit with the others?

Who still has Communist governments?

Fortune Global 500

Sunday, September 11, 2005

More on Disney Hong Kong

When Disney opened EuroDisney, there were problems stemming from Disney's lack of knowledge of local customs. Seems as though they're running into problems in Hong Kong as well, this time by adapting to local customs. Disney Hong Kong has added shark's fin soup to the menu, a popular Asian delicacy, but environmentalists protested the shark killings. Also, some are concerned that the Disney souvenirs are made using sweatshop labor. As you might expect, the LA Times has an excellent article on Disney's international trials and tribulations:

Translating Anaheim for Asia

Disney is also considering adding a park in Shanghai.......