Thursday, October 07, 2010

Renault sells $4.2B stake in truck maker Volvo - Yahoo! News

Renault sells $4.2B stake in truck maker Volvo - Yahoo! News

Ok. This is where we need a handy laminated chart to figure out what's going on.

First, what Renault owned was not the automotive part of Volvo. The Chinese own that now; Ford did own it and recently sold it to the Chinese automaker Geely.

What Renault sold what their ownership in the still-Swedish-owned Volvo Truck.

Straighforward enough, you might say. Not really, because that's just the beginning of Renault's complex ownership structure.

Renault also owns 44% of Nissan. At the same time, Nissan owns 15% of Renault.

Let's bring in the Germans. I quote here directly from Renault:



"On April 17, 2010 the Renault-Nissan Alliance and Daimler AG announced a broad strategic cooperation that will enable both groups to already realize benefits quickly from a range of concrete projects as well as sharing of best practices. The two groups also announced an equity exchange that will give the Renault-Nissan Alliance a 3.1% stake in Daimler and Daimler a 3.1% in Renault and a 3.1% stake in Nissan."



Next. I'd never heard of AvtoVAZ before, but seems that they are the top Russian auto manufacturer. Renault owns 20% of AvtoVAZ.


Last but not least -- Fiat owns 35% of Chrysler.


I did find this, a chart of auto company/brand ownership, but it's from 2008, so the interest is primarily historical. It does give a nice feel for the complexity of it, though; the only problem is that it doesn't seem to pick up the 378 different auto companies in developing countries that are owned in part by one or the other of the EU-US-China-Japan-Korea cartel.


Checking with our in-house auto industry expert, Dr. Jeff Schultz -- his take is that the player to watch is Renault/Nissan, followed by Ford. He sees these two compnaies as having the best management of any of the major auto firms.









Thursday, September 02, 2010

Burger King Said to Be in Talks With Brazilian Group - NYTimes.com

In yesterday's (September 1) International Business class, we touched on the BRIC countries -- Brazil, Russia, India and Cihina -- and their growing economic power. Here's an example for you.

Burger King Said to Be in Talks With Brazilian Group - NYTimes.com

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

How to Find Cheaper College Textbooks - Bucks Blog - NYTimes.com

The comments, so far, are illuminating.

A number of folks have advice on procuring the (much less expensive) international editions. I mention this for the sake of completeness, that's all.

How to Find Cheaper College Textbooks - Bucks Blog - NYTimes.com

Monday, August 09, 2010

Iran and China: New Developments

For the past several years, China has worked to build trade relationships with African and Latin American countries -- Argentina, for example, as well as Sudan, Nigeria and Peru.

It's motivated (as we've discussed in the IB class) by China's growing need for raw materials -- such as recycled paper (for the cardboard boxes that Made-in-China TV is shipped in), soybeans, iron ore and gold. China has an advantage over Europe and the US here -- China isn't a former colonial power (not that the US really was a colonial power or anything, but who cares?). It's been a successful relationship. Even though Japan, South Korea and Taiwan are the biggest source of Chinese imports, China is now Brazil's largest export partner (ahead of the US); Angola, Chile, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Kazakhstan are among the countries sharing that honor.

One of the Chinese trade relationships that is currently troubling to the US is the Chinese relationship with Iran, based, of course, on oil. It goes beyond imports and exports; China has invested heavily in refineries and pipelines in Iran. Moreover, the Iranian government has proposed a system of rail links between China, Iran, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan.

Trade sanctions (banning trade in strategic materials) against Iran have slowed, but not stopped trade between China and Iran.

What exactly can the US do here? Not much. The UN can make agreements, but China is going to act in their own interests. Neither the US nor the EU wants to see Iran with nuclear weapons, but it doesn't appear that the Chinese care.

Don't forget that the Chinese own a lot of US government debt [1]. And, the US exports a lot to China as well -- luxury products [2] such as wine and ginseng roots, but also basic raw materials, such as recycled paper and soybeans.

The batteries in my crystal ball need to be recharged, but I don't see much changing here. It's a tenuous balancing act between the EU [3] and the US, first, China second, and Iran, third. One solution might be for the US to take out Iranian nuclear facilities, making sure to give China plausible deniability. That could get very very messy, though. There's some indication that the Iranian government isn't all that stable, and changes there could very well make a peaceful solution possible. The US would probably have to concede in principle on Iran's right to peaceful nuclear use, though, which would be politically suicidal for the current administration.

Taking a broader and more long-term perspective, though, look at China's trade strategy overall.

China's motivations here are complex. At first glance, the whole point is access to resources. For example, the Democratic Republic of the Congo has copper, Iran has oil, Brazil has wood pulp, etc. China is also investing heavily in infrastructure development in its African and Latin American trading partners. They're thinking long-term. Remember, the Chinese are the folks who have kept track of the (more than 3 million) descendants of Confucius over a 2,500 year span.

Not everyone sees China's growing ties with Africa/Latin America to be a Big Problem; some believe that US influence in Africa is broader based and more likely to be lasting.

But, as we remeber from The Godfather, "it's only business." Trade appears to be the real motivation, with politics being only a means to an end.

It's clear that China isn't in this for their health; China cut off imports of Argentine soybean oil after Argentina imposed retaliatory tariffs in response to accusations that China is dumping textiles and kitchen appliances in the Argentine market.

Another indication that the Chinese government isn't seeing these relationships as one-sided are developments earlier with loans to Zimbabwe:

Deputy Prime Minister Arthur Mutambara says the Chinese want all loans to
be repaid before loosening its purse. According to the Mutambara the Chinese
President Hu Jintao revealed to him during a brief meeting at the World Economic
Forum in Switzerland that he considers Beijing relationship with Harare as
’business partners’ and not ’friends’.


If nothing else, the complexities of trade and politics between China and the rest of the world will give us something to think about for a very long time to come.

Notes

[1] There is some indication that Chinese purchases of US debt declined after the late 2008 economic meltdown. They still hold a lot, though by now China holds enough Treasury securities that it's probably unlikely that they could afford to unload them.

[2] Western luxury products are big in China, though most of these are imported from Europe.

[3] Europe trades a lot with China, too.

Monday, July 19, 2010

The downside of globalization

Globalization is good, right? Not necessarily. Displaced workers, easy spread of disease, for example, are two negative consequences of globalization.

In class, we discuss the impact of globalization on women, specifically, that there's some evidence that women in more globalized countries tend to do better, in terms of access to health care and education, legal rights, etc.

However, I don't think it's a simple relationship. More globalized countries are also richer countries, an.d maybe it's just that women do better in countries where there are more resources available.

MIDEAST: Women Migrant Workers With HIV Get Raw Deal - IPS ipsnews.net

BBC News - Mothers tempted to abandon babies in Moscow

Human Trafficking in Europe a 2.4 Billion Euro Industry UN Dispatch