Thursday, September 27, 2012

Divided by a Common Language

"England and America are two countries divided by a common language."

Nobody is really quite sure who said this.  Some say it was Winston Churchill, others attribute it to Oscar Wilde.  Most sources I've found give George Bernard Shaw credit, though there's no written documentation of Shaw's having said this.  But, he could have.

While looking this morning for background material on Egypt (which will be part 3 of the CIVETS series), I found an article on the BBC entitled "Britishisms and the Britishisation of American English."  That ended up as a lost hour......

One of the points of particular interest in this article is that, when Americans (USAians ?) use specific Britishisms ((such as "colour" for "color" or "centre" for "center"), that they don't come across as sophisticated, just pretentious.

Picture from Memphis Flyer


The BBC article linked to this page (Not One-Off Britishisms).  I thought I'd read the first few entries, but got totally sucked in.  The author here also skewers the pretentiousness of some US uses of British idioms, but makes an additional point, which is that language in the US is enriched by the addition of British words and phrases for which there is no specific American equivalent.  One I am particularly fond of is the verb "to vet," meaning "to look into," with the implications of determining a person's suitability for a position and of digging for the dirt before the opposition can do so.

Example #1
Example #2

Then, there's my new favourite British news source, The Guardian.  One of their columnists decided to tackle the subject of British English vs. US English. The article is interesting, but the comments are even better.  Some people take their language very seriously.  Other commenters drifted down the byways of Spanish Spanish vs. Cuban Spanish.....

Then, just to make things Even More Complicated, remember that it's not just US English and British English.
This is enough.

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Amazon adding lockers for customers at 7-Elevens and drug stores


Andrew (from the evening class) passed this along:
 
 
Also....
 
 
So, would you be interested?
 
 

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

CIVETS, Part 2 (South Africa)

We're not going in strict order here; South Africa is actually the last on the CIVETS list.

In general, we're all a lot more positive about Africa these days.  Article after article after article talks about Africa's vast untapped consumer market, a growing middle class (incomes between $2 and $20 per day) now able to afford more -- life insuranceDanone yogurt, basmati rice (imported from India),Heineken-brewed cassava beer and cosmetics from Avon, all paid for with mobile banking.

Monday, September 24, 2012

Exams in MGMT 320

The evening class has an exam tonight; the day class has an exam Wednesday.

For the evening class --
  1. I sometimes have problems in keeping Columbia and Venezuela straight on the map. I hope you don't.
  2. Was Adam Smith a mercantilist?
For the day class --
  1. Fortune global 500 companies, including the largest employers
  2. Think about languages; what ones are most useful to know?

"Stuff"

The next installments on the CIVETS should be up tomorrow, but in the meantime, look at this Chinese photographer's project to take pictures of people and all of their possessions.  The New York Times article's comments pointed out that photographer Peter Menzel did the same thing twenty years ago.....

See some of his pictures from Material World here..  A follow-up book, Hungry Planet, looked at what people eatWomen in the Material World moved beyond possessions and food to look at women's experiences overall (this is, I believe, a chapter from that book).

Monday, September 17, 2012

The CIVETS are coming. Meow?



A civet looks out of undergrowth.
Picture from http://www.cdc.gov/animalimportation/civets.html


"Meow" might be the wrong word here, since a civet isn't (technically speaking) a cat.

It's actually a member of the same order (Carnivora) as both cats and dogs, but the civets belong to the Viverridae family (as opposed to cats, whose family is Felidae).  I know you really needed to know that. 

It it worth noting, though, that the civet's natural range is in Southeast Asia, including Indonesia.

Ok.  The CIVETS countries are:

Columbia
Indonesia
Vietnam
Egypt
Turkey
South Africa

So, the theme for this week is the CIVETS, one country at a time.

First of all, the term CIVETS was invented (by British bank HSBC) as a follow-up to the BRIC grouping.  Not the Big Economies, but the smaller, "second generation emerging markets characterized by dynamic, rapidly changing economies and young, growing populations."

It's become fairly common usage; for example, there's a S & P CIVETS Index
 
One article did say that CIVETS is an artificial cluster, unlike BRIC, which really were set to be the next Big Economies.  As one writer put it, "It sort of makes you wonder if Vietnam was added to provide a needed letter."

In any case, artificial or not, let's look at the CIVETS.

Columbia

The first CIVET is Columbia.  How does it look on the numbers?

Columbia's GDP is in the $4 billion neighborhood (#29 world-wide), and growing at 5.9% (2011).  Where is this GDP coming from?  According to one source (the source for all other numbers not otherwise attributed), Columbia's major exports are petroleum, coal, emeralds, coffee, nickel, cut flowers, bananas, and apparel.  In other words, its economy is based on natural resources, agriculture, and (in last place), low-tech manufacturing.

Moreover, Columbia does not appear to be investing in their future.  Gross fixed investment (in income-producing assets) is at 23% of GDP.  To put this in perspective, Belarus is spending almost 40%, Vietnam almost 35%.

I can't determine whether or not there's capital flight going on here (which is what Argentina's been battling for years), but I did find one article talking about FDI flowing out of Columbia -- $20 billion from 200 to 2010.

Official sources claim that FDI flowing into Columbia is increasing, but even that source admits that most of the FDI is coming from oil and mining.

What does your future economy look like?  What are you investing today?

So maybe it's the demographics.  Median age is 28.3 years.  That's right in the ballpark for developing economies (for example, Indonesia is 28.5 years, Brazil is 29.6 years).  This is ok, but nothing special.

Columbia's population is 75% urbanized, which matters, because urban residents shop more, driving domestic consumption (for a discussion of this phenomenon in China, see this report).  Again, not bad.  Indonesia's 44% urbanized, Peru's at 77%.

If the CIVETS are the economies of the future, what else is being done to invest in that future.  Literacy is 90.4% and average educational attainment is 14 years.  Public spending on education is 4.7% (World Bank numbers), which puts Columbia right in line with Nepal (4.7%) and Rwanda (5%).  In contrast, (and more to the point), Brazil spends 5.7% and Costa Rica is at 6.3%.  You'd think that if you were interested in economic growth, you'd invest in education.   Columbia isn't really low, but nor is it inordinately high.

So, then, why Columbia?  Per the Wall Street Journal:

Colombia is emerging as an attractive destination for investors. Improved security measures have led to a 90% decline in kidnappings and a 46% drop in the murder rate over the past decade...


A 90% decline in kidnappings.  I don't want to joke about what is a serious issue, but that doesn't strike me as the strongest recommendation out there.

Another source cites Columbia's "pro-business government."  Well, governments change.

During the 1990s, foreign investment was pouring into Argentina, under the government of President Carlos Menem (1989-1999).  That slowed in the Argentine financial crisis in the late 1990s, and under current president Cristina Fernández , nationalization is the order of the day.

And, Columbia has some internal governance issues.  President Santos is currently preparing for Formal Diplomatic Talks with an outfit called FARC (The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia). FARC is politically left-wing and has long financed their operations by kidnapping and drug trafficking (though they claim to have given up kidnapping for ransom).

So, than, why not Venezuela?  The numbers are comparable or better (economic and demographic). 

Venezuela already exports oil; Columbia is in the beginning stages.  And, by the way, FARC just loves to take out oil pipelines....

Our problem with Venezuela -- Hugo Chávez.  However, as we've said, governments change, and we know (or suspect) that  Mr. Chávez is probably not too much longer for this world (though nobody knows for sure).

So am I dismissing Columbia?  No.  Just that there are other attractive Latin American countries in addition to Columbia.  Brazil we aren't counting here as up-and-coming, but I've also heard positive reports about Panama and Costa Rica.  Smaller countries, smaller economies than Columbia, but with growth potential.

Next up....South Africa.

Friday, September 14, 2012

"More saving. More doing." But, "nothing doing" in China.

From today's Financial Times -- Home Depot Shuts Big Box Stores in China.

According to the article, Chinese customers are less likely to be interested in do-it-yourself (DIY) home improvements (since many workers are migrant workers).  But, reasons don't matter.  Chinese consumers aren't just that into DIY.

According to Home Depot:
"Closing stores is always a difficult decision," said chairman & CEO, The Home Depot. "We are thankful for the dedicated service of our store associates in China, and we wish them all the best during this transition."

While it is closing its big box stores, The Home Depot is maintaining a new formats team to continue research and development activities. In addition, the Company is maintaining two recently-opened specialty stores - a paint and flooring store and a Home Decorators Collection store, both located in - and is in the beginning stages of developing relationships with several of China's leading e-commerce websites, a combination which the Company believes is more tailored to Chinese customers' needs and shopping preferences.

"We've learned a great deal over the last six years in China, and our new approach leverages that experience and reflects our continuing interest in providing value to Chinese customers, as well as our shareholders," said Blake.
 
My favorite part is the last paragraph. "Our new approach leverages that experience..."  Where I come from, they call that "learning from your mistakes."  But, I do loathe and despise business buzzwords.

That is all for today.

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Back to Black?

In both 320 sections, we've recently been talking about bribery, with some reference to the 2003-2006 scandal involving BAE Systems (British Aerospace Engineering) and Saudi Arabia, with a supporting cast of a large flock of fighter jets, a pink airplane, a peacock-blue Rolls-Royce, and numerous sports cars.

Although there was some speculation that BAE chairman Sir Dick Evans and his high degree of cross-cultural awareness played a part in securing the Saudi contract.

Well, BAE is in the news again.  There's a proposed merger between BAE and EADS (European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company).  Per the Financial Times:
Both companies are aiming to reach an agreement by October 10, according to two people familiar with the deal talks. BAE and EADS executives wanted to decide “whether this thing will fly or not” by that date, although the deadline could be pushed back if necessary, one of these people said.


Some Background

Both companies are defence contractors (that is, weapons manufacturers), although only about a third of EADS revenues are military (EADS includes Airbus, which is civilian aircraft).

The Economist quick update on the arms business

EADS is a Dutch company, with a complex ownership structure that includes the German, French and Spanish governments and Daimler and worldwide operations (including China and Brazil). 

BAE is British owned and  deals primarily with the UK and other English-speaking countries (US and Australia), with significant interests in India and Saudi Arabia.

The Merger

According, again, to the Financial Times, the motivation behind this is mutual benefit.  BAE has a significant presence in the US defence market (which is almost half of the world's defence spending), allowing the EADS / BAE combination to take on Boeing.  And, if military markets dry up (though plans would be to expand into additional lines of military hardware), EADS has Airbus, which is civilian aircraft.

However, nobody else -- shareholders, governments, employees, labor unions, and the lady that pushes the food trolley on the Hogwarts Express -- likes the idea.

More later....

The US Reaction

Here's the New York Times coverage; from the comments, it appears that US observers are worried about the potential power and size of the mergerd firm.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Why Ireland ?

The short 60 Minutes clip we watched today gave the impression that US high-tech and pharmaceutical companies had located facilities in Ireland just because of US corporate taxes.  And, as you were leaving, I recall saying that there's more to it than that.  Well, there is more to it than just taxes.

I did a little investigation and found out that:
  • Yes, there is a 10% corporate tax rate
  • In the early 2000's, Ireland passed a number of "technology-friendly" laws (such as digital signatures).
  • Ireland is the only English-speaking euro-zone country
  • General government pro-business attitude
  • High quality workforce
And, Ireland has become a major location for pharmaceutical companies, including firms from places other than the US, including Switzerland.  The Irish government has put a good deal of money into making Ireland attractive, including $80 million + into higher education and research in biotech

Pharmaceuticals in Ireland is a perfect example of Michael Porter's clusters (the evening class talked about this Monday night and the day class will get here in early October).  For even more details, refer to this report from Deutsche Bank.


Oh, and Cisco?  It really isn't just about the taxes.  A few recent examples:

Cisco announces 115 Galway jobs (April 2012)
Tech giant Cisco to expand Irish operation (January 2012)